On that note, should we have a "drivers/arm/msm" instead of just "drivers/msm"? Other non-msm arm sub-arches probably have the same problem and polluting drivers/ top-level for every arm-subarch maybe undesirable. --Dima On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 18:31 -0800, David Brown wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote: >> >> > You have some submission problems. one is that the subject should be >> > "drivers: msm: ..." , this patch also shouldn't go to David. >> >> Subject needs to be fixed. Patch to add drivers/msm to the maintainers >> file has been Acked, so this should be sent to the MSM maintainers. > > It was only acked by Nico, he's just the one who suggested it. I think > Greg needs to be involved at some level .. > > Daniel > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
