On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 11:14 -0800, David Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25 2011, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 14:45 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:10:45AM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: > >> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 18:06 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > >> > > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:49:43PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > >> > > > With cmwq, there's no reason to use separate workqueues. Drop > >> > > > msmfb_info->resume_workqueue and use system_wq instead. > >> > > > > >> > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@xxxxx> > >> > > I'm not the right person, CC according to MAINTAINERS > >> > > >> > ARM/QUALCOMM MSM MACHINE SUPPORT > >> > M: David Brown <davidb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > M: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > M: Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Oops, sorry about that. So how does the patch look? Are you gonna > >> take it through msm tree or shall I take it? > > > > David ? > > > > Daniel > > Is it difficult for you to test this change, Daniel? I can pull it in > once we verify it still works. Carl V. can test it, and review it I think .. Daniel -- Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
