On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 14:45 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:10:45AM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 18:06 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:49:43PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > With cmwq, there's no reason to use separate workqueues. Drop > > > > msmfb_info->resume_workqueue and use system_wq instead. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@xxxxx> > > > I'm not the right person, CC according to MAINTAINERS > > > > ARM/QUALCOMM MSM MACHINE SUPPORT > > M: David Brown <davidb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > M: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > M: Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Oops, sorry about that. So how does the patch look? Are you gonna > take it through msm tree or shall I take it? David ? Daniel -- Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
