On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 16:20 -0800, David Brown wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote: >> >> +#define cpu_is_msm7x01() 0 >> >> +#define cpu_is_msm7x30() 0 >> >> +#define cpu_is_qsd8x50() 0 >> >> +#define cpu_is_msm8x60() 0 >> > >> > Now that I look at this again, why not drop the "x" all together ? >> >> That might be better for the 8x60. The complexity is that most of the >> MSM chips have some variants, where the CPU running Linux isn't changed, >> but the modem CPU is different (think CDMA/UMTS). Until 8960, that was >> distinguished by the second letter. >> >> Either way doesn't quite match reality, unfortunately. There are >> devices using a MSM7201 and others using a MSM7601. As far as Linux is >> concerned, there isn't any difference between them. If someone wanted >> to try and identify the device they have with the code, it could be >> confusing for either name chosen. >> >> I was planning on turning msm8x60 into msm8660, since that seems to be >> the most common one. Perhaps the decoder ring should be put into the >> help text for the options so people can at least figure out which is >> which. > > Are there any of those which do , right now, have Linux support for more > than one variant ? All of them, in fact. MSM7201 and MSM7601 are identical as far as Linux is concerned. Same goes for MSM8250 and MSM8650. Our dev boards are a somewhat random mix of the two, and it doesn't matter which one you use. MSM8960 is a completely different chip, it just shares a similar name, to other chips. David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
