On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 16:20 -0800, David Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote: > >> +#define cpu_is_msm7x01() 0 > >> +#define cpu_is_msm7x30() 0 > >> +#define cpu_is_qsd8x50() 0 > >> +#define cpu_is_msm8x60() 0 > > > > Now that I look at this again, why not drop the "x" all together ? > > That might be better for the 8x60. The complexity is that most of the > MSM chips have some variants, where the CPU running Linux isn't changed, > but the modem CPU is different (think CDMA/UMTS). Until 8960, that was > distinguished by the second letter. > > Either way doesn't quite match reality, unfortunately. There are > devices using a MSM7201 and others using a MSM7601. As far as Linux is > concerned, there isn't any difference between them. If someone wanted > to try and identify the device they have with the code, it could be > confusing for either name chosen. > > I was planning on turning msm8x60 into msm8660, since that seems to be > the most common one. Perhaps the decoder ring should be put into the > help text for the options so people can at least figure out which is > which. Are there any of those which do , right now, have Linux support for more than one variant ? Daniel -- Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
