On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 12:30 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 12/08/2010 12:26 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > The last time I thought you said there was no size change ? My tests > > showed a decrease .. > > Oh, right. There was no size change when I moved __delay() into the > header in addition to the others. So is there a problem with doing the inlining then ? If you get the same size kernel, then that seems like a lateral move in your case. Daniel -- Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
