On 12/08/2010 12:26 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > > The last time I thought you said there was no size change ? My tests > showed a decrease .. Oh, right. There was no size change when I moved __delay() into the header in addition to the others. > > What compiler optimizations are you talking about See Subject: Weirdo gcc 4.3.x behaviour Message-ID: <20101121191148.GA12234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29950 -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
