Re: [RFC PATCH] platform: Faciliatate the creation of pseduo-platform busses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 04:59:35PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> (On that point Greg, what is the reason for even having the
> /sys/devices/platform/ parent?  Why not just let the platform devices
> sit at the root of the device tree?  In the OF case (granted, I'm
> biased) all of the platform_device registrations reflect the actual
> device hierarchy expressed in the device tree data.)

If we sat them at the "root", there would be a bunch of them there.  I
don't know, we could drop the parent, I guess whoever created the
platform device oh so long ago, decided that it would look nicer to be
in this type of structure.

> Now, having gone on this whole long tirade, it looks like having
> separate platform bus types may not be the best approach after all.

I totally agree, and thanks for the detailed explaination, it saved me
from having to write up the same thing :)

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux