On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:06:08 +0200 "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 04:46:59AM -0400, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:40:19 +0200 > > "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > The IOMMU-API is not about SR-IOV. > > > > That's true. However, the point is that include/iommu.h is far from > > the IOMMU-API. > > > > You could still insist that include/iommu.h is designed for the > > generic IOMMU-API. But the fact is that it's designed for very > > specific purposes. No intention to make it for generic purposes. > > I have no clue about the ARM iommus on the omap-platform. From a quick > look into the header file I see some similarities to the IOMMU-API. I am ARM's iommu stuff might be more appropriate as the IOMMU-API than include/linux/iommu.h > also very open for discussions about how the IOMMU-API could be extended > to fit the needs of other platforms. Only because nobody has tried to > discuss about such an effort is no reason to push the IOMMU-API back. Well, the reason (nobody has tried) might be that linux/iommu.h doesn't look something intended for the generic IOMMU-API. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
