On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:26:55 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thursday 29 July 2010 05:35:48 FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > > > > From what I have been able to tell, the IOMMU interface was written by > > > AMD/Intel to allow the kvm code to work with a common IOMMU interface. To > > > > Don't confuse the IOMMU interface with the DMA API that Arnd > > mentioned. > > > > They are not related at all. > > Exactly, thanks for the clarification. I also didn't realize that there > is now an include/linux/iommu.h file that only describes the PCI SR-IOV > interfaces, unlike the generic IOMMU support that we have in your > include/linux/dma-mapping.h file. > > Maybe we should rename linux/iommu.h to something more specific so we > can reduce this confusion in the future. I also said that linux/iommu.h was a bad name when it was introduced :) Well, the author disagreed. Now the name actually confuse developers. The author might rethink. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html