On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:21:05PM -0700, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > Joerg Roedel wrote: > > The DMA-API already does this with the help of IOMMUs if they are > > present. What is the benefit of your approach over that? > > The grist to the DMA-API mill is the opaque scatterlist. Each > scatterlist element brings together a physical address and a bus > address that may be different. The set of scatterlist elements > constitute both the set of physical buffers and the mappings to those > buffers. My approach separates these two things into a struct physmem > which contains the set of physical buffers and a struct reservation > which contains the set of bus addresses (or device addresses). Each > element in the struct physmem may be of various lengths (without > resorting to chaining). A map call maps the one set to the other. Okay, thats a different concept, where is the benefit? Joerg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
