On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 03:49:24PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 18:46 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > > These are all mostly small patches that I've sent out a few times with > > > no comments. Let me know if you see any issues. > > > > > > The following changes since commit 7ee744f22ffad619e23912a22d1b2795e10ed825: > > > Stephen Rothwell (1): > > > Add linux-next specific files for 20100324 > > > > Never base your tree on linux-next. You really should use a stable > > tree, such as Linus' tree. The linux-next tree is constantly thrown > > away and rebuilt, and your own tree will keep a reference on that > > obsoleted linux-next version otherwise. > > I only based this pull request on next , since I can't get Russell tree > anyplace else. I've had patches in the past which I've had to use next > cause there are underlying changes that I can only find in next .. So no > I don't base development trees on next generally. http://www.home.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/ has a link to gitweb for it, and a url pointing to where it is on the ftp/http site: # rmk's GIT tree # rmk's random kernel patches and git tree It's not like it's hidden. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
