On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 18:46 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > These are all mostly small patches that I've sent out a few times with > > no comments. Let me know if you see any issues. > > > > The following changes since commit 7ee744f22ffad619e23912a22d1b2795e10ed825: > > Stephen Rothwell (1): > > Add linux-next specific files for 20100324 > > Never base your tree on linux-next. You really should use a stable > tree, such as Linus' tree. The linux-next tree is constantly thrown > away and rebuilt, and your own tree will keep a reference on that > obsoleted linux-next version otherwise. I only based this pull request on next , since I can't get Russell tree anyplace else. I've had patches in the past which I've had to use next cause there are underlying changes that I can only find in next .. So no I don't base development trees on next generally. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
