RE: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Remove 32bit timestamp logic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



...
> My guess is that *most* 32-bit architectures do not have a 64-bit
> cmpxchg - not even the irq-safe one.

Does any sparc32 even have a 32-bit cmpxchg?
The original versions (which were definitely SMP capable)
only had a byte sized atomic exchange that always wrote 0xff.

Sparc32 does have 'load/store double' (two 32bit registers)
but 32bit cpu like nios2 and (I think) RISCV (and probably
anything else loosely based on MIPS) only have single register
load/store instructions.
They'll mainly be UP only, I've not looked at RISCV enough to
see what it has when supporting SMP.

> For the UP case you can do your own, of course.

A generic version of the soft interrupt disable code would help.
Then it would just be an inc/dec of memory rather than having
to save the current interrupt enable state.
Especially for code that only disables interrupts for a few
instructions - so the costs of deferring the interrupt don't
happen often.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux