On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 20:08:10 -0800 Mina Almasry wrote: > 1. For (b), would it be OK to implement a very minimal version of > queue_[stop|start]/queue_mem_[alloc|free], which I use for the sole > purpose of reposting buffers to an individual queue, and then later > whoever picks up your queue API effort (maybe me) extends the > implementation to do the rest of the things you described in your > email? If not, what is the minimal queue API I can implement and use > for devmem TCP? Any form of queue API is better than a temporary ndo. IIUC it will not bubble up into uAPI in any way so we can extend/change it later as needed. > 2. Since this is adding ndo, do I need to implement the ndo for 2 > drivers or is GVE sufficient? One driver is fine, especially if we're doing this instead of the reset hack.
