On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:18:40PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023, at 23:11, Charlie Jenkins wrote: > > > > Thank you for pointing that out, I had not realized that macro existed. > > Since riscv keeps NET_IP_ALIGN at 0 it should be expected that > > ip_fast_csum is only called with 32-bit aligned addresses. I will update > > the comment and refer to that macro. riscv supports misaligned accesses > > but there are no guarantees of speed. > > Just to clarify for your comment: riscv gets the default value of '2', > which is the one that makes the header aligned. > > Arnd Oops, typo. I meant to write 2. - Charlie
