On Wed, Oct 25, 2023, at 23:11, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
>
> Thank you for pointing that out, I had not realized that macro existed.
> Since riscv keeps NET_IP_ALIGN at 0 it should be expected that
> ip_fast_csum is only called with 32-bit aligned addresses. I will update
> the comment and refer to that macro. riscv supports misaligned accesses
> but there are no guarantees of speed.
Just to clarify for your comment: riscv gets the default value of '2',
which is the one that makes the header aligned.
Arnd
