On 3/15/23 15:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023, at 02:23, Damien Le Moal wrote: >> On 3/14/23 21:11, Niklas Schnelle wrote: >>> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends >>> not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for >>> those drivers using them. >> >> I do not see HAS_IOPORT=y defined anywhere in 6.3-rc. Is that in linux-next ? >> There is a HAS_IOPORT_MAP, but I guess it is different. > > It's defined in patch 1 of the series, so the later patches > can't be applied into subsystem trees without that. > > We can either merge patch 1 as a preparation first, or keep it > all together as a series. Got it. Either is fine with me. To allow option 2, I will send my ack. Thanks ! > > Arnd -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
