Re: [PATCH v3 02/38] ata: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/14/23 21:11, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> those drivers using them.

I do not see HAS_IOPORT=y defined anywhere in 6.3-rc. Is that in linux-next ?
There is a HAS_IOPORT_MAP, but I guess it is different.

> 
> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/Kconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/Kconfig b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> index b56fba76b43f..e5e67bdc2dff 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> @@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ endif # HAS_DMA
>  
>  config ATA_SFF
>  	bool "ATA SFF support (for legacy IDE and PATA)"
> +	depends on HAS_IOPORT
>  	default y
>  	help
>  	  This option adds support for ATA controllers with SFF

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux