Re: [PATCH 16/23] sched: Use lightweight hazard pointers to grab lazy mms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 11:51 AM Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If you already accept PTI, [..]

I really don't think anybody should ever "accept PTI".

It's an absolutely enormous cost, and it should be seen as a
last-choice thing. Only really meant for completely broken hardware
(ie meltdown), and for people who have some very serious issues and
think it's "reasonable" to have the TLB isolation.

No real normal sane setup should ever "accept PTI", and it shouldn't
be used as an argument.

              Linus



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux