On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:32 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 4:08 PM Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > + bitmap_set_value(old, 64, state[0], 32, 0); > > + bitmap_set_value(old, 64, state[1], 32, 32); > > Isn't it effectively bitnap_from_arr32() ? > > > + bitmap_set_value(new, 64, state[0], 32, 0); > > + bitmap_set_value(new, 64, state[1], 32, 32); > > Ditto. > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko Hi Andy, With bitmap_set_value() we are also specifying the offset (or start) position too. so that the remainder of the array remains unaffected. I think it would not be feasible to use bitmap_from/to_arr32() here. Regards Syed Nayyar Waris