Re: [PATCH 4/9] ARM: syscall: always store thread_info->syscall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 02:42:43PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I need some idea how this numberspace is managed in order to
> > understand the code so I can review it, I guess it all makes perfect
> > sense but I need some background here.
> 
> I also had never understood this part before, and I'm still not
> sure where the 0x900000 actually comes from, though my best
> guess is that this was intended as a an OS specific number space,
> with '9' being assigned to Linux (similar to the way Itanium and
> MIPS do with their respective offsets). By the time EABI got added,
> this was apparently no longer considered helpful.

It is an OS specific number space, originally designed to allow
RISC OS programs to be run under Linux.  There was indeed such a
project, but that died and the code ripped out. EABI, by using
SWI 0 - or more accurately, not reading the SWI opcode, trampled
over the ability for RISC OS programs to be run under Linux.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux