Re: [PATCH 4/9] ARM: syscall: always store thread_info->syscall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Arnd,

help me out here because I feel vaguely stupid...

On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:38 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  {
> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT))
> +               return task_thread_info(task)->syscall & ~__NR_OABI_SYSCALL_BASE;

Where __NR_OABI_SYSCALL_BASE is
#define __NR_OABI_SYSCALL_BASE       0x900000

So you will end up with sycall number & FF6FFFFF
masking off bits 20 and 23.

I suppose this is based on this:

>         bics    r10, r10, #0xff000000
> +       str     r10, [tsk, #TI_SYSCALL]

OK we mask off bits 24-31 before we store this.

>         bic     scno, scno, #0xff000000         @ mask off SWI op-code
> +       str     scno, [tsk, #TI_SYSCALL]

And here too.

>         eor     scno, scno, #__NR_SYSCALL_BASE  @ check OS number

And then happens that which will ... I don't know really.
Exclusive or with 0x9000000 is not immediately intuitive
evident to me, I suppose it is for everyone else... :/

I need some idea how this numberspace is managed in order to
understand the code so I can review it, I guess it all makes perfect
sense but I need some background here.

Thanks,
Linus Walleij



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux