On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 09:37:39AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 21:08:08 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 09:59:49PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > Masami Hiramatsu (16):
> > > kprobes: Add generic kretprobe trampoline handler
> > > x86/kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler
> > > arm: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler
> > > arm64: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler
> > > arc: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler
> > > csky: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler
> > > ia64: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler
> > > mips: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler
> > > parisc: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler
> > > powerpc: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler
> > > s390: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler
> > > sh: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler
> > > sparc: kprobes: Use generic kretprobe trampoline handler
> > > kprobes: Remove NMI context check
> > > kprobes: Free kretprobe_instance with rcu callback
> > > kprobes: Make local used functions static
> > >
> > > Peter Zijlstra (5):
> > > llist: Add nonatomic __llist_add() and __llist_dell_all()
> > > kprobes: Remove kretprobe hash
> > > asm-generic/atomic: Add try_cmpxchg() fallbacks
> > > freelist: Lock less freelist
> > > kprobes: Replace rp->free_instance with freelist
> >
> > This looks good to me, do you want me to merge them through -tip? If so,
> > do we want to try and get them in this release still?
>
> Yes, thanks. For the kretprobe missing issue, we will need the first half
> (up to "kprobes: Remove NMI context check"), so we can split the series
> if someone think the lockless is still immature.
Ok, but then lockdep will yell at you if you have that enabled and run
the unoptimized things.
> > Ingo, opinions? This basically fixes a regression cauesd by
> >
> > 0d00449c7a28 ("x86: Replace ist_enter() with nmi_enter()")
> >
>
> Oops, I missed Ingo in CC.
You had x86@, he'll have a copy :-)
