Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prctl functions for shadow stack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/27/2020 7:08 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 7:07 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 6:36 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

* H. J. Lu:

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 6:19 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

* Dave Martin:

You're right that this has implications: for i386, libc probably pulls
more arguments off the stack than are really there in some situations.
This isn't a new problem though.  There are already generic prctls with
fewer than 4 args that are used on x86.

As originally posted, glibc prctl would have to know that it has to pull
an u64 argument off the argument list for ARCH_X86_CET_DISABLE.  But
then the u64 argument is a problem for arch_prctl as well.


Argument of ARCH_X86_CET_DISABLE is int and passed in register.

The commit message and the C source say otherwise, I think (not sure
about the C source, not a kernel hacker).

It should read:

arch_prctl(ARCH_X86_CET_DISABLE, unsigned long features)


Or

arch_prctl(ARCH_X86_CET_DISABLE, unsigned int features)


Like other arch_prctl()'s, this parameter was 'unsigned long' earlier. The idea was, since this arch_prctl is only implemented for the 64-bit kernel, we wanted it to look as 64-bit only. I will change it back to 'unsigned long'.

Yu-cheng



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux