Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] regset ->get() rework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] regset ->get() rework
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:00:29 +0100
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200629182349.GA2786714@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20200629182349.GA2786714@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

Hi Al,

what's the state of the series?  I noticed it hasn't shown up in
linux-next so far.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] regset ->get() rework
  - From: Al Viro

References:
- [RFC][PATCHSET] regset ->get() rework
  - From: Al Viro

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] objtool,x86_64: Replace recordmcount with objtool
Next by Date: RE: [PATCH 04/18] csum_and_copy_..._user(): pass 0xffffffff instead of 0 as initial sum
Previous by thread: [PATCH 07/41] [ia64] access_uarea(): stop bothering with gpregs_[gs]et()
Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] regset ->get() rework
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Newbies] [x86 Platform Driver] [Netdev] [Linux Wireless] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux Filesystems] [Yosemite Discussion] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux