On 13/07/2020 15:39, Zhenyu Ye wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On 2020/7/13 22:27, Jon Hunter wrote: >> After this change I am seeing the following build errors ... >> >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s: Assembler messages: >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:854: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:870: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1095: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1111: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1964: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1980: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:2286: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:2302: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:4833: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x6' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:4849: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x6' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:5090: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x6' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:5106: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x6' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:874: Error: attempt to move .org backwards >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1115: Error: attempt to move .org backwards >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1984: Error: attempt to move .org backwards >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:2306: Error: attempt to move .org backwards >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:4853: Error: attempt to move .org backwards >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:5110: Error: attempt to move .org backwards >> scripts/Makefile.build:280: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.o' failed >> make[3]: *** [arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.o] Error 1 >> scripts/Makefile.build:497: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/mm' failed >> make[2]: *** [arch/arm64/mm] Error 2 >> >> Cheers >> Jon >> > > The code must be built with binutils >= 2.30. > Maybe I should add a check on whether binutils supports ARMv8.4-a instructions... Yes I believe so. Cheers Jon -- nvpublic
