Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 3/6] arm64: Add tlbi_user_level TLB invalidation helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:20:59AM +0800, Zhenyu Ye wrote:
> On 2020/7/10 0:48, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 04:03:11PM +0800, Zhenyu Ye wrote:
> >> @@ -189,8 +195,9 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_page_nosync(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >>  	unsigned long addr = __TLBI_VADDR(uaddr, ASID(vma->vm_mm));
> >>  
> >>  	dsb(ishst);
> >> -	__tlbi(vale1is, addr);
> >> -	__tlbi_user(vale1is, addr);
> >> +	/* This function is only called on a small page */
> >> +	__tlbi_level(vale1is, addr, 3);
> >> +	__tlbi_user_level(vale1is, addr, 3);
> >>  }
> > 
> > Actually, that's incorrect. It was ok in v2 of your patches when I
> > suggested to drop level 0, just leave the function unchanged but I
> > missed that you updated it to pass level 3.
> > 
> > pmdp_set_access_flags -> ptep_set_access_flags ->
> > flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault -> flush_tlb_page -> flush_tlb_page_nosync.
> 
> How do you want to fix this error? I notice that this series have been applied
> to arm64 (for-next/tlbi).  Should I send a new series based on arm64 (for-next/tlbi)?

Just a patch on top with a Fixes: tag.

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux