Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 3/6] arm64: Add tlbi_user_level TLB invalidation helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Catalin,

On 2020/7/10 0:48, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 04:03:11PM +0800, Zhenyu Ye wrote:
>> @@ -189,8 +195,9 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_page_nosync(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>  	unsigned long addr = __TLBI_VADDR(uaddr, ASID(vma->vm_mm));
>>  
>>  	dsb(ishst);
>> -	__tlbi(vale1is, addr);
>> -	__tlbi_user(vale1is, addr);
>> +	/* This function is only called on a small page */
>> +	__tlbi_level(vale1is, addr, 3);
>> +	__tlbi_user_level(vale1is, addr, 3);
>>  }
> 
> Actually, that's incorrect. It was ok in v2 of your patches when I
> suggested to drop level 0, just leave the function unchanged but I
> missed that you updated it to pass level 3.
> 
> pmdp_set_access_flags -> ptep_set_access_flags ->
> flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault -> flush_tlb_page -> flush_tlb_page_nosync.

How do you want to fix this error? I notice that this series have been applied
to arm64 (for-next/tlbi).  Should I send a new series based on arm64 (for-next/tlbi)?

Thanks,
Zhenyu




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux