On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:23:41PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:21:44AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > I'm generally okay with all proposed non-functional changes that come > > up that are just eliminating arch-specific cruft to use new shared > > kernel infrastructure. I recall replying to a few indicating this, but > > I missed a lot more. If it would be helpful I think I can commit to > > doing at least this more consistently, but I'm happy to have other > > maintainers make that call too. > > It woud be great if you could at least apply with a tentative ack. > At least for some trees we try very hard to get a maintainer ack, > so silence is holding things back to some extent. OK. > I'd also like to second Arnds request to figure out if any bits > are truely dead. E.g. 64-bit sh5 support very much appears so. I agree, and just replied there. Rich
