On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:21:44AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > I'm generally okay with all proposed non-functional changes that come > up that are just eliminating arch-specific cruft to use new shared > kernel infrastructure. I recall replying to a few indicating this, but > I missed a lot more. If it would be helpful I think I can commit to > doing at least this more consistently, but I'm happy to have other > maintainers make that call too. It woud be great if you could at least apply with a tentative ack. At least for some trees we try very hard to get a maintainer ack, so silence is holding things back to some extent. I'd also like to second Arnds request to figure out if any bits are truely dead. E.g. 64-bit sh5 support very much appears so.
