On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:05 AM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 05:19, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > If we remove __NR_syscall_count from the uapi header I'd > > suggest dropping it completely and switching its two current > > users to __NR_syscalls. > > I'm not removing the __NR_syscall_count macro; just place it > in asm/unistd.h file for the above reason. Ok, I'll apply this series to the xtensa tree and make my cleanups on top of it. > FYI, I made sure that the kernel will build with my patch. I would > appreciate if you can perform the boot test on the actual platform. I did a simple boot testing on a range of configurations, it works. I'll also run LTP a bit later. -- Thanks. -- Max
