Re: [PATCH] sh: remove unneeded constructor.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/04/2018 05:51 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 12:47:08PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> You do want to readd the __GFP_ZERO flag to the second user of PGALLOC_GFP,
>> don't you?
> 
> I missed that!  Probably only relevant for SH-64.  But yes ... probably better
> to make this explicit then:

As far as I know sh5/sh-64 never shipped, it was just some prototype hardware
that didn't go to production?

(I know the j-core project is taking a different 64 bit approach, much more like
x86-64's mode bit than itanium two completely different instruction sets, but
last I heard they're just now testing the j32 with-mmu bitstreams so it'll be a
while before that's relevant. :)

Rob



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux