Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: fpsimd: Fix bad si_code for undiagnosed SIGFPE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 12:27:16 -0600
>
>> Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 03:13:08PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> However, the purpose of this as an RFC was to get feedback on whether
>>> adding FPE_UNKNOWN is considered acceptable at all from an API
>>> perspective -- the precise number doesn't matter for that discussion.
>>>
>>> Do you have any view on this?
>> 
>> That seems as good a solution as any too me.  It is reality and it
>> happens in the code and there are several places of the same form I
>> would use it, just to get rid of the FPE_FIXME.
>
> Eric, feel free to do something similar on Sparc.

Will do.

This sounds like a good solution for this weird corner case, that
appears on multiple architectures.

Eric




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux