From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 12:27:16 -0600 > Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 03:13:08PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> However, the purpose of this as an RFC was to get feedback on whether >> adding FPE_UNKNOWN is considered acceptable at all from an API >> perspective -- the precise number doesn't matter for that discussion. >> >> Do you have any view on this? > > That seems as good a solution as any too me. It is reality and it > happens in the code and there are several places of the same form I > would use it, just to get rid of the FPE_FIXME. Eric, feel free to do something similar on Sparc.
