RE: Does this break IA64 Linux?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Does this break IA64 Linux?
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 18:30:16 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dlp-product: dlpe-windows
Dlp-reaction: no-action
Dlp-version: 11.0.0.116
In-reply-to: <10175.1512748454@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
References: <151274828931.9961.17801232134228415862.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <151274828194.9961.4230316917108602662.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <10175.1512748454@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Thread-index: AQHTcDzPnHCIYrypB02AbtztW/0TN6M5xG4w
Thread-topic: Does this break IA64 Linux?

> Hi Tony, Fenghua,
>
> Can you take a look at this patch and see if it breaks IA64?

David,

Which patch is "this patch". I don't see any link or attachment.

-Tony

References:
- [PATCH 1/5] Construct init thread stack in the linker script rather than by union
  - From: David Howells
- [PATCH 0/5] Consolidate init_task handling and expand macros
  - From: David Howells
- Does this break IA64 Linux?
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: Adding init_task consolidation patches to linux-next
Next by Date: Re: Does this break IA64 Linux?
Previous by thread: Does this break IA64 Linux?
Next by thread: Re: Does this break IA64 Linux?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Newbies] [x86 Platform Driver] [Netdev] [Linux Wireless] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux Filesystems] [Yosemite Discussion] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]