Does this break IA64 Linux?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx
Subject
: Does this break IA64 Linux?
From
: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 15:54:14 +0000
Cc
: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
151274828931.9961.17801232134228415862.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk
>
Organization
: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
References
: <
151274828931.9961.17801232134228415862.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk
> <
151274828194.9961.4230316917108602662.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk
>
Hi Tony, Fenghua, Can you take a look at this patch and see if it breaks IA64? David
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Does this break IA64 Linux?
From:
David Howells
RE: Does this break IA64 Linux?
From:
Luck, Tony
References
:
[PATCH 1/5] Construct init thread stack in the linker script rather than by union
From:
David Howells
[PATCH 0/5] Consolidate init_task handling and expand macros
From:
David Howells
Prev by Date:
[PATCH 1/5] Construct init thread stack in the linker script rather than by union
Next by Date:
Adding init_task consolidation patches to linux-next
Previous by thread:
[PATCH 1/5] Construct init thread stack in the linker script rather than by union
Next by thread:
RE: Does this break IA64 Linux?
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Kernel Newbies]
[x86 Platform Driver]
[Netdev]
[Linux Wireless]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Linux Filesystems]
[Yosemite Discussion]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Samba]
[Device Mapper]