Re: [PATCH 08/19] arm64: introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread (for AArch32 compat)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 1:34:59 PM CEST Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> @@ -78,9 +79,9 @@
> >>
> >>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> >>   #define TASK_SIZE_32               UL(0x100000000)
> >> -#define TASK_SIZE           (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \
> >> +#define TASK_SIZE           (is_compat_task() ?             \
> >>                              TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64)
> >> -#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk)   (test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_32BIT) ? \
> >> +#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk)   (is_compat_thread(tsk) ? \
> > It should be
> > +#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk)      (is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(tsk)) ? \
> > is_compat_thread takes "struct thread_info *thread" while TASK_SIZE_OF takes
> > "struct task_struct *tsk"tsk.
> 
> If that doesn't throw an error does that mean that TASK_SIZE_OF is
> unused?

I think that is correct. On some architectures, TASK_SIZE (which is used)
is defined as TASK_SIZE_OF(current), but the definition above doesn't
do that and there are no other users.

	Arnd

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux