Re: [PATCH 08/19] arm64: introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread (for AArch32 compat)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> @@ -78,9 +79,9 @@
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>>   #define TASK_SIZE_32		UL(0x100000000)
>> -#define TASK_SIZE		(test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \
>> +#define TASK_SIZE		(is_compat_task() ?		\
>>   				TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64)
>> -#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk)	(test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_32BIT) ? \
>> +#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk)	(is_compat_thread(tsk) ? \
> It should be
> +#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk)      (is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(tsk)) ? \
> is_compat_thread takes "struct thread_info *thread" while TASK_SIZE_OF takes
> "struct task_struct *tsk"tsk.

If that doesn't throw an error does that mean that TASK_SIZE_OF is
unused?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@xxxxxxx
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux