On 03/03/2016 05:49 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:30:17PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: >> On 03/03/2016 03:38 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:02:27PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Mark Rutland (3): >>>>> kasan: add functions to clear stack poison >>>>> sched/kasan: remove stale KASAN poison after hotplug >>>>> arm64: kasan: clear stale stack poison >>>>> >>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S | 4 ++++ >>>>> include/linux/kasan.h | 6 +++++- >>>>> kernel/sched/core.c | 3 +++ >>>>> mm/kasan/kasan.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> Looks good to me - via which tree would you like to see this merged upstream? >>> >>> I'd prefer the arm64 tree as arm64 is (the most) affected by the issue >>> in practice. >>> >>> I'm happy for this to go via another tree if that's simpler; I'm not >>> aware of anything that's likely to conflict in the arm64 tree. >>> >>> Catalin, Andrey, Andrew, any preference? >>> >> >> I don't have any. arm64 tree is fine by me. >> >> For the patchset: >> >> Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > Cheers! > > Following [1], I intend to change patch 1 to start at task_stack_page(t) > rather than task_thread_info(task) + 1, to keep things simple. > > I assume that your Reviewed-by would still apply in that case? > Sure. > Thanks, > Mark. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/2/428 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
