On 03/03/2016 03:38 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:02:27PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> >>> Mark Rutland (3): >>> kasan: add functions to clear stack poison >>> sched/kasan: remove stale KASAN poison after hotplug >>> arm64: kasan: clear stale stack poison >>> >>> arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S | 4 ++++ >>> include/linux/kasan.h | 6 +++++- >>> kernel/sched/core.c | 3 +++ >>> mm/kasan/kasan.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> Looks good to me - via which tree would you like to see this merged upstream? > > I'd prefer the arm64 tree as arm64 is (the most) affected by the issue > in practice. > > I'm happy for this to go via another tree if that's simpler; I'm not > aware of anything that's likely to conflict in the arm64 tree. > > Catalin, Andrey, Andrew, any preference? > I don't have any. arm64 tree is fine by me. For the patchset: Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
