Re: [PATCH] arm64: Preserve the user r/w register tpidr_el0 on context switch and fork in compat mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 05.05.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Will Deacon:
> On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 05:24:18PM +0100, André Hentschel wrote:
>> From: André Hentschel <nerv@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Since commit a4780adeefd042482f624f5e0d577bf9cdcbb760 the user writeable TLS
>> register on ARM is preserved per thread.
>>
>> This patch does it analogous to the ARM patch, but for compat mode on ARM64.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: André Hentschel <nerv@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@xxxxxxx> 
>>
>> ---
>> This patch is against Linux 4.1-rc1 (b787f68c36d49bb1d9236f403813641efa74a031)
> 
> Curious, but why do you need this? iirc, we added this for arch/arm/ because
> of some windows rt (?) emulation in wine. Is that still the case here and is
> anybody actually using that?

Yes, Windows ARM binaries are the well known use case, but also the compat mode should do
what the arm kernel is doing I’d think and the code wasn't adjusted yet.

What i'm curious about is why the main TLS register on arm64 is the user writeable,
I'm not an security expert but this looks odd. I could easily provoke a crash by writing
to it...

CCing Catalin Marinas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux