Hi Arnd, On 02/24/2015 05:54 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 24 February 2015 00:04:21 Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >> So, tried a different approach and removed pt_regs from the UAPI ptrace.h, >> replacing it with a new user_regs that describes how registers are passed >> to user. This however is also problematic, as pt_regs is already used >> by glibc (not really sure what for). >> > > I've looked at glibc and could not find a use for pt_regs there. Where > did you find it? It's quite possible that it's incorrect as well > if the structures don't match. > Gah, no, you are right. I got confused. So it would be OK to avoid remove pt_regs from the uapi headers? How does this affect the signal handling nios2 implementation? -- Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur www.vanguardiasur.com.ar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
