Re: Dirty/Access bits vs. page content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It builds and boots on ia64 with no new warnings.  I haven't done
> anything more stressful than booting though - so unsure whether
> there are any corners cases that might show up under load.

Thanks. It shouldn't actually change any behavior on ia64 (you'd have
to do any dirty bit batching yourself), I was mainly worried about
compile warnings due to not having the set_page_dirty() declaration
due to some odd header file issues.

               Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux