On 10/31/2013 02:11 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 10/31/2013 01:45 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On 10/23/2013 07:36 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> Most of architectures not use '__init' for setup_profiling_timer(), so
>>> need remove it, or can generate warning (e.g. arc with allmodconfig):
>>>
>>> MODPOST vmlinux.o
>>> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x3c682): Section mismatch in reference from the function write_profile() to the function .init.text:setup_profiling_timer()
>>> The function write_profile() references
>>> the function __init setup_profiling_timer().
>>> This is often because write_profile lacks a __init
>>> annotation or the annotation of setup_profiling_timer is wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>>> index bca3052..3bdac11 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>>> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>>> /*
>>> * not supported here
>>> */
>>> -int __init setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>>> +int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>>> {
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>>> index 11789be..3bef058 100644
>>> --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>>> +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ void __init platform_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>>> init_cpu_present(&mask);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -int __init setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) /* not supported */
>>> +int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) /* not supported */
>>> {
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>>> index 8a252f2..2e8cd36 100644
>>> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>>> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>>> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)
>>> }
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>>> -int __init
>>> +int
>>> setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>>> {
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> In theory this change is OK. However this is legacy code at best and it would be
>> better to define a weak definition in kernel/profile.c and remove this cruft from
>> relevant arches. I'll send out a patch.
>>
>
> That sounds good to me.
>
Hmm... if so, recommend to modify another architectures which also only
return "-EINVAL", but without "__init" prefix.
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
