On 10/31/2013 01:45 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 10/23/2013 07:36 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> Most of architectures not use '__init' for setup_profiling_timer(), so
>> need remove it, or can generate warning (e.g. arc with allmodconfig):
>>
>> MODPOST vmlinux.o
>> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x3c682): Section mismatch in reference from the function write_profile() to the function .init.text:setup_profiling_timer()
>> The function write_profile() references
>> the function __init setup_profiling_timer().
>> This is often because write_profile lacks a __init
>> annotation or the annotation of setup_profiling_timer is wrong.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>> arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c | 2 +-
>> arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>> index bca3052..3bdac11 100644
>> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>> /*
>> * not supported here
>> */
>> -int __init setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>> +int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>> {
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>> index 11789be..3bef058 100644
>> --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ void __init platform_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>> init_cpu_present(&mask);
>> }
>>
>> -int __init setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) /* not supported */
>> +int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) /* not supported */
>> {
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>> index 8a252f2..2e8cd36 100644
>> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>> -int __init
>> +int
>> setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>> {
>> return -EINVAL;
>
> In theory this change is OK. However this is legacy code at best and it would be
> better to define a weak definition in kernel/profile.c and remove this cruft from
> relevant arches. I'll send out a patch.
>
That sounds good to me.
> -Vineet
>
>
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
