Re: [PATCH 0/7] preempt_count rework -v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/10/2013 09:24 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>> also.. yuck on using "dec"
>> "dec" sucks, please use "sub foo  ,1" instead
> 
> That's a bigger instruction, largely due to the constant.
> 
>> (dec sucks because of its broken flags behavior; it creates basically a
>> bubble in the pipeline)
> 
> Intel could (and should) just fix that. It's "easy" enough - you just
> need to rename the carry flag as a separate register (and make sure
> that the conditional instructions that don't use it don't think they
> need it).
> 
> In fact I thought Intel already did that on their large cores. Are you
> sure they still have trouble with inc/dec?
> 

Big cores are fine, but Atom (and presumably Quark) might still suffer a
performance penalty.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux