Re: [PATCH UPDATED 1/7] x86: don't show trace into stacktrace machinery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:22:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> This is double negation and is generally wrong in English. I think you
> want to say:
> 
> "%pf specified neither frame nor regs for ..."
> 
> or
> 
> "%pf didn't specify either frame or regs for ..."
> 
> Or maybe even passive and shorter:
> 
> "%pf: No frame or regs specified for %%current."
> 
> and so on.

Crap, right, will post an updated version soon.

Thanks!

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux