Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86: don't show trace beyond show_stack(NULL, NULL)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:35:08PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Ok - but my other observation probably holds, that the bp == 0 special case in 
> dump_trace() should be changed to a [printk()-ed] warning or so? No user will pass 
> in bp == 0 legitimately, AFAICS.

Yeah, seems so.  I'll verify and add a warning message if both @bp and
@regs aren't specified in dump_trace().

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux