Re: [PATCH 3/5] dump_stack: consolidate dump_stack() implementations and unify their behaviors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Martin.

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 08:48:08AM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > The couple of extra fields aren't worth an s390 version of dump_stack()
> > that differs from all other architectures.
> > Please drop the s390 version as well. Thanks!
> 
> Hmm, we would lose task_thread_info(current)->cpu and current->thread.ksp,
> I don't care much about the kernel stack pointer which has been stored at
> the last call to __switch_to but the cpu number might be interesting.
> Could we add the cpu number to the generic dump_stack version?

Yeah, I can move CPU from show_regs() to dump_stack().  It actually
makes sense.  I'll do that and convert s390 together with other archs.

Thanks!

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux